Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sugar2cell's avatar

It’s genuinely encouraging to see cellular energy supply gaining more attention.

For a long time, we’ve focused on markers and outcomes — but not enough on whether energy actually reaches the cell where it’s needed.

This shift feels important.

David R Bell's avatar

Good piece. I'll make a couple of comments, one experiential, the other more theoretic. First, as long-term endurance cyclist, I've used the mental framing of "homeostatic resistance" (HRE) as a way of thinking about the physical sensations of effort not "suffering" or "pain." It's simply the body telling me this is what is feels like to apply effort, when it prefers to conserve energy. With time, every athlete learns what levels of "resistance" feel like, but they're just that, feelings. The other point, is the resistance to energy flow in life, is the result of formation of persistent structure. Life requires structure or it dissipates, and it requires energy flow. I've come to think of the definition of life, over generations, as "a persistence pattern that captures and shapes flow of energy over time". That seems to me to be a better definition of life that most textbooks. This looks like a fruitful line of research. Good luck!

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?